Monster Jam!!!

January 30th, 2008

A co-worker of mine had some extra tickets through a friend of his for the annual Monster Jam in Sacramento last Saturday.  He invited me and my son to go with him and his buddy who bought the tickets.  I have not been to one of these things since I was a yout in VA (where incidentally they called it a “Monster Truck and Tractor Pull, because they had souped-up tractors pulling things), but I had a hell of a good time.  We saw the monster truck called Undertaker, and like five or six others, along with a bunch of regular 4×4’s racing, and some bikes doing some pretty amazing jumps.

Except for my friend, who is 1/2 Japanese, my son, who is 1/2 Filipino, and the odd Mexican or two, it was a sea of white trash.  For those of you who are from the Sacramento area, it was like all of North Sac and Rio Linda emptied into Arco Arena for the evening.  Ive never seen so many mullets in my entire life.  And when I say mullets, I mean the kind like they had on that old show, The Mullets.  Everywhere I turned I saw a racing jacket advertising auto parts that was like two sizes too small, platinum blond hair that had not been cut in years, and dirty little kids running around like mad-people.  It was just a few steps away from freak show.

And boy-oh-boy, were they selling America.  They had the Air Force honor guard there, a Hummer with the faces of Iraqi war dead painted on it,  a 30′ American flag and cranked up Lee Greenwood.  The best part was the guy sitting in front of me with the pierced C-spine and the half-naked (HOT!) girlfriend, who halfway through God Bless the USA raised his hand in a Ronnie James Dio salute and screamed at the top of his lungs,”I love my flag, man!!!”

But the best part of the show was the way my son reacted to it.  He was as excited as I have ever seen him.  He was jumping up and down, pumping his fists in the air, screaming for joy and waiving his Undertaker flag wide and proud.  The next day he told me that he dreamed of Undertaker the night before, and “it was cool!”  I think I’m going to go to this again next year.  It was noisy, it stank, and it was NOT my typical crowd, but the boy and I had a great time.  He usually shies away from crowds and loud noise, but this was definately something not to be missed for him.

Book Review pages

December 27th, 2007

OK, I’m gonna go ahead and call it for 2007.  I started seriously writing and posting book reviews exactly one year ago today, with S.M. Stirling’s Dies the Fire, posted on Dunenovels (for want of anyplace better) on 12/27/2006.  Since then reviewing books has become a complete obsession for me.  I was always a voracious reader, but this year I decided to try to do something fun with my pastime that was new.  I really hope that you agree.

In the last year I have gotten some very nice compliments from readers.  I have also gotten some excellent feedback from authors whom I love.  Charles Stross told me that he liked my review of Missile Gap, but left it at that.  David Marusek told me that I was the only reviewer to hit on one of the major themes in his book Counting Heads, which was the loneliness in a technologically advanced society.  One of the reasons I started doing these things in the first place was because I was inspired by David Itzkoff’s review of the same book, so that really got my blood pumping!  I even corresponded with James Gunn regarding my review of The Listeners.  He was very complimentary, and even pointed out that I omitted discussion of one important literary device he used, which was the way the interpersonal communication in each chapter corresponded with and reflected the way the aliens were communicating with us.  I made the decision to omit that part because 1) of length; and, 2) because I was afraid I couldn’t do the issue justice.  I promised him I would rewrite the thing soon, and I’m now very nervous about sending him my review of The Joy Makers.  I’ve posted that review, but maybe I will think about it a little bit more before I send it to him.

This last calendar year I read well over 100 genre novels.  I have posted reviews of 95 of them, and have three more written and subject to proofing, ready to go up on the main reviews site, for a one-year total of 98 reviews.  My goal for year one was 100, so that ain’t bad, is it?  Some books that I read (mainly new ones) I thought just were too awful to even bother writing about.  There were at least fifteen of those, but probably more like seventeen.  There was one book I did not bother finishing, but I can’t for the life of me remember what it was as I sit here today.  Something by Tanith Lee, but I just cannot remember the title.  Anyway, other than that I’m not going to name names, so please don’t ask.  I also read books that I meant to write reviews of, such as Allen Steele’s Coyote trilogy, which is about interstellar colonization, but just did not get to them.  Now so much time has passed that I’m sure I will have to re-read them to do any justice.  I don’t even know where my notes are any longer.  By the way, I would have given each book three stars.

So as rewarding and gratifying to me this whole thing has been, I hope most of all that you get something out of reading the reviews.  I think when I started this my main purpose was to get conversations going about books that I loved.  Unfortunately I tend to love books that have been relegated to the dust heap of time, or niche novels that nobody has ever heard of.  For Christ’s sake I got all excited this year about two Chad Oliver collections I was given.  Has anyone but me even heard of Chad Oliver?  I’m pretty sure I’m not ever going to get much conversation about his books, which is one reason I consider all the time reviewing newer books.  Also, I can actually sell the newer reviews, so there’s that too.  There is just a greater chance the genre readers have read a new release, and remember it enough to discuss it.  But doing reviews of newer books is much different than the older ones.  People tend to get pissed at you if you spoil newer books.

So, thanks to all of you who keep apprised of what I am doing at the book review site.  I really appreciate your participation, and thank you very much for your attention.  I’m pretty sure I would keep doing this even if I was the only one who ever visited.  But you have no idea how nice it is to know that you actually are there and interested.

Remainder Marks

December 21st, 2007

Occasionally I will see a listing for a book on eBay that says that the book I am considering is “remainder marked.” Ive had a friend ask me lately what that meant, as she had encountered it too on eBay. Basically a remainder in publishing and in the music business is the same thing: Its returned product that the retailer was not able to sell after initial release or after an overzealous printer puts too many copies of a re-release. Here is how it works:

Sometimes publishers overestimate the market for a particular book. Sometimes the publisher will decide to print more than they can reasonably expect retailers to sell and actually anticipate some copies will go unsold. Publishers understand that books, especially hardbacks, have a limited shelf life, and that booksellers only have so much shelf space to display books on. So they allow retailers to return unsold books in bulk. At the point in time that this happens the initial demand has usually died down, so if there are more than a few copies, the publisher acknowledges that they will never be able to sell them in the marketplace, so they make them remainders by marking them and selling them for pennies on the dollar.

How are they marked? Usually in different ways. It used to be that they were marked the same way that unsold albums were marked: By a hold drilled somewhere in the hard cover. These days they usually take an easier approach and draw a thick black line on the bottom of the outside pages. Here is an example of the most typical type of mark:

Photobucket

Someone just aligns the books, turns them all over, and runs down the line with a marker drawing on them all, never picking the marker up. For some reason this guy took a return pass, but thats the way it goes, huh? Ive also seen much more blatant markings, such as one entire edge being painted purple, yellow or black, and Ive seen other marks that are so subtle that you would swear that someone made a mistake and accidentally marked a book. Usually when a publisher is trying to be subtle they will put a small stamp of some figure on the book somewhere, usually never under the covers, but on the spine or the end papers. I have been meaning to send out messages to my list of publishers to ask if they could tell me how they mark remainders, but have not gotten around to doing that yet. I suspect that many will not tell me, especially if they do a subtle mark.

Whenever you purchase a used hardback book, or even a new one, you should be aware to look around for a remainder mark. If a book has one, it is of course worth less on the collector’s market because it is defaced.

Teletubbies: Childhood Myth or Farsighted Preparation for the Apocalypse?

December 11th, 2007

Considering that I am an adult, I think I have watched way too many episodes of the Teletubbies. I doubt that there is a person on the planet who has not heard of these sweet little dimwits. Four monochromatic pudge-pots with televisions built into their stomachs, only out-annoyed by their producer’s next project, Boobah. That one pretty much takes the cake for insipid entertainment. But for anyone but a two to three year old, Teletubbies are up there pretty high on the annoy-o-meter. It was around my hundredth episode (hey, I love my kids, OK?) that I started to really wonder what kind of mind could produce such an educational travesty. I mean, I know that the Tubbies have been subjected to interpretive criticism before. I personally found the US Senate had hearings on the sexual orientation of one of them to be fascinating and penetrating. But those kinds of complaints are just situational; just little nibbles at the truth. I prefer a wholesome chomp whenever I want to dig my fangs into something, and this was no exception.

I ran through some ideas, and put some thought into each one before discarding it. But I got nowhere, and found the truth to be quite elusive. In short, I swiftly came to an impasse in my deconstruction of the Teletubbies. But one fateful day I brought the subject up with my brother. At the time I was playing with the idea that the show was a multi-layered expression of naturalism. I mean, on a philosophical level the Tubbies can’t seem to figure out what the heck is going on. For all they know the magic fairies come at night and leave them cool toys that they play with until their inner Gods speak to them through their stomachs. They also seem dedicated to expressing social mores in non-verbal ways so as to inculcate the babes in the audience.

On an an artistic level the thing looks like its shot on a set, but the outside scenes are really well done, and the lighting looks as natural as any I have ever seen. That part is kind of beautiful, like that new iPod advertisement where the people are standing outside on a street on an early summer evening in front of a black tarp.

From a hedonistic perspective, as far as I can tell those little buggers are naked as jaybirds.

But I was getting nowhere. I could not reconcile the Baby-in-the-Sun image, which seemed to me to be more of a zoo keeper than a benevolent and warm God figure. I also couldn’t get my mind around their habitat, which seems to be a submerged saucer, and has a definite industrial feel to it. Then there is the robot, and when I mentioned that, the light shined on my brother’s face. “Dude,” he said to me. “What if this is a SF genre story?” I was a little taken aback at first, not because the idea was shocking, but because that was pretty much what I had been talking around for weeks. “Of course!” I said. So we spent a little while analyzing the imagery in the show.

In a nutshell, here it is. There are four chubby moon-faced morons, Tinky-Winky, Dipsy, La-La and Po, who spend the entire show interacting with each other and simple objects. The four each are of different sizes, signifying different ages, have different body colors, and most importantly, have different facial skin colors from pasty white to mulatto, and one with an East Asian looking skin hue. Every fifteen minutes or so a pinafore-looking radio tower sends out a TV signal that is received by the antenna each Teletubby has on their head, and shown on the TV screen in one of their stomachs. The shorts that they watch together usually show a human child interacting with the world and experiencing some new phenomenon. Sometimes there are African children looking at exotic animals. Then a British kid looking at frogs in his back yard. Or an Aussie kid looking at a car, or something basic like that. When they are not watching shorts, they are playing with simple objects that they find around their home, such as balls, bicycles, doors, and the like. Toys and simple machines only. That is pretty much the show, but there are some setting and background elements that are relevant here.

As I mentioned above the Teletubbies live in an underground saucer of sorts. In their domain they are cared for by a snout-nosed vacuum cleaner/robot that helps them get food (”Tubby-Toast), cleans up after them, and tells them how to do certain things. Each morning the sun rises, of course, but the inside the sun is the visage of the face of a caucasian baby. The baby only giggles, but whenever he does so, it seems to prompt the Teletubbies to action. The Teletubbies live and sleep in the underground saucer, and wake up every day to go out into the world to experience what ever has been left for them by some unknown hand. Moreover, the Tubby’s saucer is in the bottom of a little valley, which the Tubbies never leave. We see nothing outside the inner rim walls. Oh, what I wouldn’t give for a glimpse of a ruined Cleveland or Detroit over the rise! The depression itself has a few small trees, lots of flowers, and giant bunnies all over the place.

So from a genre point of view, this show looks post-apocalyptic to me. The Tubbies are GM versions of the various races who have been brought back to life from the preserved corpses of the war dead. Unfortunately the aliens who did this had no adult humans to show them how to raise children, since they obviously came so long after the nuclear deluge, but they do have children’s videos, and they show them to the Teletubbies every fifteen minutes or so during the day as a way of teaching them how to behave like a human should. They concentrate on human baby stories because the Teletubbies themselves are so immature and need the basics first. The saucer is a bunker of sorts set up by the alien overlords, whose avatar watches the Tubbies through the artificial sun. The fact that the thing is shot on an outside set only reinforces the feeling that the world is manufactured, not naturally occurring.  The bunker is buried in the Earth to prevent too much radiation exposure during the night. I think that the dim-wittery of even the largest (thus oldest) Teletubby is indicative of the damaging amount of radiation in their post-apocalyptic environment. They basically start out as little morons, like all humans did, and age into bigger morons because of the radiation’s effects on their immature brains. I must admit though, the giant bunnies confuse me a bit. If I let my imagination run wild, I could easily see ordinary rabbits evolving because of massive background radiation into something fierce with lots of bulk, fangs and a bad attitude. Kind of like that drawing in the original GM’s guide from TSR’s game Gamma World. My hypothesis is that the alien overlords took those ferocious creatures and modified them to be docile again. That the Tubbies never approach the bunnies very closely only shows an inherent fear in them, perhaps of still remaining fangs and a wicked case of proximity anxiety. Or, perhaps the bunnies are there to teach the Tubbies to live in harmony with their environment, and thus eliminate the possibility of the Tubbies descendants ever going to war again. Or maybe the Tubbies are being taught animal husbandry skills, for when they mature and grow their molars. I don’t know.

Anyway, I think I’m on to something, but I haven’t found anyone else on the web that agrees with me. Perhaps those seeking the truth will find this in a Google search and witness their beliefs to me by comment.

SF boards and BBS

November 27th, 2007

Why, O why do SF boards (and I suppose boards and forums in general) have to be populated with such opinionated assholes? Not everyone mind you. If I don’t think you’re an ass and you’re reading this, you know who you are, so don’t go there. But I belong to three or four of those thing, and without exception (save for one, Worm’s, where they run a pretty tight ship and somehow manage not to attract the idiots) they are for the most part peopled by dim-witted morons. Is it just that forum boards equalize everyone in anonymity and these people I encounter and engage are those who I would peg as dip-shits in real life right away and therefore avoid? Or is it that people really turn into dicks when they realize that they really are anonymous, so they just let it all hang out? I don’t know for sure, but sometimes (sometimes only) it can be so tiring to even think about some of those fuck heads. Hell, maybe I’m the ass. ;)

I cant count the number of times Ive gone on line and expressed a thought, only to be told I’m doing the virtual equivalent of repressing the serfs. Id have to say that 99% of the time, that is not what I am doing, and certainly never when I don’t even know who the hell you are! And is it really a crime to dare to contradict somebody, even if what hey say makes sense? Isn’t there still a divergent point of view out there, or are we willing not to sacrifice that for on-line politeness? I certainly hope not. As a matter of fact, FUCK THAT! I may not be very smart in the grand scheme of things, but I know this: There is always a different point of view. I’m sick to death of idiots out there who wont engage me because I contradict them. Its like they take it personally. Imagine the stupidity, and the lost chances to actually learn something! I know that I suffer for it.

Mother Fucker

November 26th, 2007

I’m back to work today.  Ugh. 

BSG Razor, saw it this morning

November 25th, 2007


I just watched it, and I thought it was good. I’m pretty sure that it was always written not as a bridge but to placate fans in between the long season breaks. And I personally don’t care too much that it had very little to say directly about the action in the series.

I really liked the wartime imagery focus on WWII rather than Iraq and Afghanistan. It was a nice break that kept the action totally ramped up, which I think is the strong point of that show. Did anyone else notice the WWII visual metaphors? Pearl Harbor, the “just following orders” mentality, Kamikaze Cylon ships, small force attack/rescue missions, Mengele-like experimentation and the like? It definately made the war elements of the show much more dire, as it invoked the end-of-life-as-we-know-it Nazi threat instead of the attack-as-funds-are-available al Queda threat. And considering this show’s facility with that kind of imagery, that really is saying something.

As for Kendra being a Cylon, I really hope not. That would totally undo all the gravitas her character accumulated in dealing with her guilt. If its revealed that she is a Cylon, then everything she went through means nothing, as all she was doing was killing things that she is not, and apparently only shares a dim and stolen genetic heritage with. Revealing her as a Cylon later on would basically be taking her entire character back to zero, which would be really confusing as the end of the show is probably going to have enough loose ends to wrap up. Besides, we all already have a hope for who the last Cylon is, and making it a character nobody has seen before would really piss some fans off.

I also thought the throwback Cylons were pretty cool. “By your command,” indeed!

Oh yea. I almost forgot. Did I really need to be reminded in the ad breaks, twice no less, that there were a coupla’ lesbians on board? Gee, thanks for the update Quiznos. I think I got it the first time I saw it. Honestly now….did anyone else record it? Go back and look at the first Quiznos Moment where they remind us that Six is gettin jiggy with captain deathmonger. They give it to us like a secret whispered between 13-year old boys.

Overall, it was a win for the show.  And it certainly quenched any and all frustrated desires I have for the regular seasons to come back.  Plus, its gonna get those producers more money, and they certainly deserve it and all the other measures of success we can heap upon them, and hopefully encourage more intelligent and worthy SF programs.

Razor

November 23rd, 2007

OK.  Who’s psyched with me for BSG Razor tonight?  I can’t fucking wait for it!  Ive had the DVD set to record it for a solid week, I have a bottle of scotch on hand for generous pourings, and Ive explained that the sala is off limits tomorrow evening.  Childish shennanigans must be relegated to the kid’s room tomorrow after 8pm, on pain of spankings.

Reviews Update

November 22nd, 2007

I’m still getting over this damn flu. Its a serious lingerer this year. But, I did manage to cook an entire Thanksgiving dinner for my wonderful family of four, and write (or at least finish) four new book reviews today. They are already posted.  I also have three more started, and three books already selected for next week. And, I’m excited here, I found a very rare book that I have been searching for years called Greener Than you Think, by Ward Moore, the author of Bring the Jubilee. Bring the Jubilee is probably my favorite SF book of all time, as noted on my brand new “What are your ten favorite SF books” thread that I just started on my BBS.

Man, I’m a total geek, aren’t I?

Anyway, today is Thanksgiving, and I think that this is the best one I have had in years. I managed to plan things out well in advance and spend a minimum of time in the kitchen. Plus, we managed to tastefully deflect all our various family member’s attempts to wiggle an invite to our house on T-Day. I’m sure some of them will read this, so I hope you are happier for Sylvia and I that we had a GREAT time with the four of us then you are irritated that I had a plan to let you do your own thing. Anyway this one was awesome. Nick actually put some thought, without being asked no less, into what he was thankful for. He uttered it at the table without request. It was pretty much little boy stuff, but it was heart-warming. Binks was thankful for her toys. It was awesome. Now, time to plan for the descent of the family on Christmas Day. I don’t think I’m going to be able to avoid that one. ;)

New Reviews…

November 13th, 2007

…are up. Ive been sick as a dog lately, and have been ignoring my duties. Looks like I’m not going to get 100 done this year. Maybe next. Sigh.